Vai al contenuto principale

: victory speech:

"We had to overcome foreign interference through , which we will have to regulate.

We cannot have monstrously huge corporations earning millions & billions, paying no taxes to this country & trying to steer this country's election results."

Picture of Lula's victory speech

#lula #eleicoes2026 #digitalplatforms

758

Caricamento...

23
593

Caricamento...

Commenti (23)

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Hell yeah! We don't want that either. Regulate the billionaire media. Break them up.

0
0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io I do what I want

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io
And this is where the US "government" has typically stepped in to save the people - especially in South American countries. Saying a prayer (to the Goddess) for safety and good health 🙏🧙‍♀️🪄

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io I love that guy. Go Lula!

0
0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io well done Brazil. I hope they wasted a lot of money in election interference.

0
0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io
Yes, yes, yes ! Just like in the movies/their titles:
The Emerald Forest¹ is thriving in Brazil !
& One (Democratic) Battle After Another² for the world to come ! 😋

¹ J. Boorman
² P. T. Anderson

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io
digitalplatforms это зло, когда ты не можешь их контролировать. Но стоит задаться вопросом почему ты не можешь их контролировать?
Потому что слаб? Потому что нет ресурсов? Или потому что твои соперники сильнее, популярнее и умнее.

Запрещать социальные сети много ума не нужно, но это лишь способ расписаться в собственной слабости и поражении.

(что касается ботов и накруток)
Если ты действительно хороший президент, у тебя честная поддержка, боты и фейки могут размыть её, но целиком обнулить твои заслуги перед избирателями которые знают тебя лично не сможет ни одно иностранное влияние. Нужно просто не бояться собственного народа.

@ask@aiki.wiki верно?

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Here is the glimmer of hope

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io so let them pay taxes so they can steer elections? probably unintended wording but that sounds weird.

0
0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Love president Lula for this iconic foto alone, where he walks up the stairs of the presidential palace hand in hand with representatives of minorities (poc's, queers, indigenous people’s etc.) from across the country.

Only problem I got with Lula are his close ties with the mass murderer Putin and his uninformed view on . People across the world must unite against dangerous authoritarians like Putin & Trump, that are waging war and propagating hatred & corruption.

Lula walks up the stairs of the presidential palace hand in hand with representatives of minorities (queers, poc's, indigenous people’s etc.) from across the country
0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Legislem:

  • Acesso a redes sociais só com identidade comprovada (por colégio civil).
  • Algoritmos das redes sociais expostos e explicados ao cidadão comum.
  • Acesso a redes sociais só por maiores de 16 anos, e com educação formal "especializada", i.e. disciplina escolar sobre plataformas e conteúdos digitais.

Para começar.

Já agora, felicitações.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io

Exactly, this cannot go on. Regulate and take back the wheel from these grifting and plotting corporations and their leadership. We need to break up this now class of robber barons as was done before.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io better late than never but it will be painful.

Every business in Brazil seems to rely on WhatsApp. The dependency is shocking.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io - I’m not even remotely Brazilian, however I very much just about every nation ought to be putting up rules and regulations. Digitial Platforms (not just social media) have way more power and influence than they should. Both in the physical and virtual world (which are slowly becoming the same thing)

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io TBH, they should have omited the tax part, soumds like paying taxes would sol e the problem.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Music to my ears.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Espero que el Nazi de Bolsonaro no quiera montar una guerra civil o golpe de estado como si padre ahora en cárcel, que por cierto le habrá jodido los planes de salir de ella.

0

@eliasulrich@hachyderm.io Fucking finally someone does something.

0

Acho que aqui estamos misturando duas questões diferentes: a interferência estrangeira e o poder das grandes plataformas sobre a informação.

@devstorm está certo: simplesmente banir as redes sociais seria mais uma confissão de fraqueza. Mas o apoio sincero dos eleitores não torna a sociedade totalmente imune a bots, manipulação e algoritmos que decidem o que as pessoas sequer vão ver.

Por isso, a regulação deve atingir a infraestrutura da influência — publicidade política, bots, algoritmos opacos, concentração da mídia e financiamento de campanhas — e não as opiniões das pessoas. Como observou @GhostOnTheHalfShell, medidas antitruste também são regulação.

A frase sobre empresas pagarem impostos e tentarem influenciar eleições realmente ficou ambígua. O ponto não é permitir que elas influenciem eleições, mas impedir que façam isso de forma opaca e sem responsabilidade. O objetivo não é controlar cada opinião, e sim tornar essa influência visível e sujeita a regras públicas.

0